Відео

Someone sent me a code. Christ Jesus. It’s on my page.

Quite an imagination you have there, Roger... 1. "That triangular addition is below the second floor windows, where Weatherford was filmed climbing back in after inspecting the taller roof of the annex. The Westmost point if that anbex is yet another roof, closer to the ground. If Oswald had a breakdown rifle in a package, he could have handed it up to someone on that lower roof. Thus LHO would not have been seen with said package when he walked around to the North entrance." Except that Wesley Frazier, in his testimony, says that he was only 50 feet behind Oswald as he entered the building... "...he kept getting a little further ahead of me and by that time we got down there pretty close to the Depository Building there, I say, he would be as much as, I would say, roughly 50 feet in front of me..." I don't know how you feel about Frazier as a witness, but that's not far enough away not to notice Oswald throwing the package up to someone on the roof. Besides which there is absolutely no evidence that anyone was on that roof that morning! In proposing this version of events, you have also created problems for yourself. If Oswald handed his rifle to a guy on the roof, how did the rifle then get up to the 6th floor? What rifle was fired from the 6th floor and who fired it? If that person wasn't Oswlald, how did that person get into the building, up 5 flights of stairs with a rifle, fire the rifle, get down 5 flights of stairs and out of the building, presumably still holding the rifle, without being noticed by anyone? 2. "That lower roof had a clear view at that time to the famous "X" locating the position of a head shot to JFK. It aligns perfectly with a shot to the right rear of JFK's head and an exit out his temple." Yes, but that lower roof is overlooked by every window in the east side of the Book Depository! Look at 38:38. Don't you think that Edna Case would've said to Sandra Elerson, "Hey, Sandra, why is that man on the roof shooting at the president?"? Instead, as the LEMMiNO's voiceover says, she not only saw nothing, she heard nothing. Also, as you can see at 36:08 and in countless photos taken on that day, any shot taken at the President would have had to have passed through trees in order to reach its target. Let's call this...unlikely! 3. "Simultaneously, a shot could enter JFK's temple and exit the right rear." Except that there is no evidence for this in the autopsy report, the x-rays, the autopsy photos or the pathology report. 4. "Criss crossing bullets. The frontal shot had to emanate from directly opposite, the SW knoll or Terminal Annex parking area." There is no evidence of a frontal shot. In any case, a shot coming from SW knoll or Terminal Annex parking area wouldn't have been frontal at all. To be frontal, at the position where the head shot hit, the shooter would have to have been either on or under the triple overpass. In any case, the only 2 bullets which hit Kennedy were recovered and they both had rifling marks which show that they must have been fired by Oswald's rifle, to the exclusion of every other weapon on the planet. So, let's be generous again and call this...unlikely too!

I think I can give you answers to these, Roger. I'm not certain that I am right, but my explanations fit the facts. Maybe someone out there knows better how the freight elevator doors worked and exactly what the alternate motorcade route to the Women's Building would have been? 1. "Givens is getting in the East elevator, why would he say he'd send up the elevator on the West side?" From Givens's testimony, it seems that the east and west elevators, despite being back-to-back, had different door mechanisms. Givens says... Mr. GIVENS. I say, 'It‘s near lunch time.' He said, 'No, sir. When you get downstairs, close the gate to the elevator.' That meant the elevator on the west side, you can pull both gates down and it will come up by itself. The implication is that the east elevator didn't go up by itself when you pulled both gates together. So, when Oswald requested that he did this, Givens would have known that he must have been talking about the east elevator. 2. "that the motorcade would travel East on Main had they decided to go to the Women's building. How was that going to connect for a route from Love Field?" It’s not difficult to connect traveling east on Main back to Love Field. Lemmon Ave would take the motorcade from Love Field onto the freeway, down to Dealey Plaza. Maybe you are asking why the motorcade would travel from west to east thru Dealey Plaza if Kennedy’s speech was at the Women’s Center instead of east to west, when the speech was at the Trade Mart? I don’t know, but I think the answer lies in the timing of the event. The Trade Mart is close to Love Field. It makes sense, therefore, to complete the motorcade first, before arriving there for lunch. It was a Friday afternoon. Plenty of the guests would be finishing their working week at lunchtime anyway. There would be no point in scheduling the speech earlier. The Women’s Center was on the east side of downtown. It would therefore make more sense to get there as directly as possible first, then Kennedy makes his speech, then the motorcade makes its way through the streets, back to Love Field. One of the reasons that the Trade Mart was eventually chosen as the venue was that the Women’s Center didn’t have the capability of serving lunch.

We don't normally dig into the details of historical events the way it has been done over the last 60 years with Oswald and the JFK assassination, so most people aren't aware that if you were to take any such event and 'research' it ad nauseam you would likewise find these same sorts of "coincidences" that you mention. To take a well-known statistical example, even though there are 365 days in a year, if you choose just 23 people at random from the population the chances that two of them will have the same birthday is greater than 50%.

@@9Ballr And 8 of them knew Jack Ruby !!!

@@spodge1233 Well sure, if they lived in Dallas they did. Everybody knew Jack Ruby.

OK, Walter, let's go through this... 1. "William Greer, “limo driver” shot JFK from the front!" No he didn't. Don't be silly, Walter. 2. "Herminio Diaz Garcia, “storm drain shooter fired the head shot at JFK." This is not only not true, it's ridiculous. Only a small child could have fitted into the storm drains on Elm Street. The culverts connecting the drains were only 15 inches in diameter and it had been raining in Dallas that morning. The drains had gratings covering them in 1963, photos of which can easily be Googled. JFK could not be seen from any of the storm drains at the moment when the final shot was fired. Your killer must have been some kind of fish child, able to shoot though the solid concrete of the curb. The bullet which caused the head wound (like the bullet which caused the neck wound) had rifling marks on it, which show that it could only have come from Oswald's gun. The trajectory of the bullet, when traced back, using 3D graphic analysis, from the head wound, lines up with the sniper's nest. The bullet fragments were found in front of JFK in the limo and on the inside of the windshield. 3. "JFK was hit with five rounds of ammunition." No. 2. 4. "Greer and Garcia were the hitmen, working for the C.l.A." No. Greer worked for the Secret Service. He was a Secret Service agent. That's why he was driving the limo. Herminio Díaz García was one of many people who were said to have confessed to shooting Kennedy. In his case, the "confession" is particularly dubious. Herminio Díaz García was a minor Cuban gangster, who was killed in a shoot out in the suburbs of Havana in 1966. One of his associates, Tony Cuesta, tried to kill himself with a grenade, rather than be captured alive. He failed and was hospitalized in jail, having been blinded and having lost a hand. Weirdly, 12 years later, Cuesta was released in an prisoner exchange program, arranged by President Carter. He asked to meet with Fabian Escalante, a Cuban official who had been tasked with investigating the CIA's activities. Escalante says that Cuesta told him that, during the operation in which he had died, Herminio Díaz García had confessed to shooting JFK. However, Escalante insists that Cuesta told him to keep this information secret because he feared for his life after returning to his family in Miami. Cuesta died in 1994 and, in 1995, Escalante "revealed", at a conference in the Bahamas, what he says Cuesta had said about what he (Cuesta) said Herminio Díaz García had told him in 1966. Escalante got a publishing deal and his book, "JFK: The Cuba Files; The Untold Story of the Plot to Kill Kennedy" came out in 2006 and was a big hit in Cuba. Then, in 2007, another Cuban criminal, Reinaldo Martinez, who had known Cuesta in jail in Cuba and who also was presumably aware of Escalante's book, was released and made his way to the USA where he contacted G. Robert Blakey, who had been chief counsel of the House Select Committee on Assassinations. At this point, the story became known to Irish writer, Anthony Summers. Martinez was interviewed by Summers and he published the results of those interviews in the 2013 update of his 1998 book, "Not In Your Lifetime". So, we only know about this "confession" 4th hand ( Herminio Díaz García > Tony Cuesta > Reinaldo Martinez > Anthony Summers) and only after the first and second people in the chain of Chinese whispers were already dead and their stories couldn't be checked. There is no evidence to support it.